In “Hechinger’s Field guide to Ethnic Stereotypes” by
Kevin and Curtis Hechinger, the Hechinger brothers want readers to know that
stereotypes are nonsense because we are all different, and therefore, should be
ignored. One way that the Hechinger’s
show readers this is by listing out all of the different stereotypes of
different ethnicities. The Hechinger’s
also use ridiculous “facts” to make stereotypes seem even more crazy and
unsupported. For example, according to
the book, “Many Scandi-Americans… have spent so much time consuming dairy
products, eating baked goods, and sitting out the snows on their living room
sofas, they have fundamentally altered their genetic code.” This quote is just one example of a crazy “fact”
that is obviously untrue and supports a ridiculous stereotype. Finally, the Hechinger’s use humor to make
fun of stereotypes and show that they are nonsense. All of these examples show and support how
people should not be confined to stereotypes or to listen to stereotypes.
The Hechinger’s want readers to laugh at the hilarity of
stereotypes, and feel surprised at the assumptions of some stereotypes. One way that the Hechinger’s do this is by
using humor to make fun of and show the ridiculousness of stereotypes. For example, in the book, the author’s say, “But
recent improvements in down-coat technology have led to the dispersal of Latinos
across the country.” This is one of the
many ways that the book uses humor to disperse myths about ethnic groups that
stereotypes and generalizations bring and support. The Hechinger’s also simplify the topic by
using casual language. This use of
language familiarizes and connects the narrator and the reader, causing the reader
to feel comfortable while reading the book, and allows them to feel surprised
at certain revelations and facts that contradict stereotypes.
After reading “Hechinger’s Field Guide to Ethnic
Stereotypes,” I agree with the Hechinger’s that stereotypes should be ignored,
but I think that the way they supported and built up their ideas with humor was
confusing and unnecessary. Their humor
was too forced and to me it ended up just being confusing and seemed at least a
little racist. I agree with their message,
but I thing that they went about saying it the wrong way.
Dear Rose,
ReplyDeleteThis is a very sophisticated critical analysis! As you know, I'm writing my picture book on the same social issue as you-I had seen this book in the library, and skipped over it for the same reasons you stated in your conclusion! I couldn't tell if they were serious racists, or if this was a comedic parody. I completely agree with your claim, and if you could've derived those thoughts from this book, maybe it deserves a second chance. Overall, great blog post!!! <3
-Henry McKenna